5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
7ed1e99ab0 read the feature flags in sextest in the way sexc does
Some checks failed
Sex CI / build-linux (pull_request) Failing after 5m14s
sextest resolves #+ and #- itself -- it reads the program and prints
what survives to sexc -- so a flag spelling it does not recognise
decides which branch gets compiled
2026-09-21 17:10:41 +03:00
1195e5c191 look past comments in a public form's header 2026-09-21 17:05:11 +03:00
05bab57867 say what is wrong with a pointer type, and stop mangling fn ones
The guard against nested pointer chains searched every sublist for a
`*', including the ones that hold a type of their own.

A function type with a pointer parameter, while the same type with an int
parameter passed. (* [char 4]) was let through as well and came out
as `vector-ref char 4 * p'.

A `*' inside an array or a function type belongs to that type, so the
search stops there. What the flat conversion cannot express is now
named: a fn type is a function pointer already, and a pointer to an
array is not supported.

Parameters of a function type are walked without their names. C writes
a parameter name into a declarator and a type has none, so fmt-c prints
whatever it is handed there as a type: `(s (* char))' came out as
`char(*) s'.

fmt-c printed a nameless array declarator's #f into the C, which showed
up in these parameters.
2026-09-21 17:00:24 +03:00
dc98bb3551 separate tags and typedefs
C has two namespaces and the database had one. A typedef of a tag's
name wiped it.

Tags, i.e. struct, enum and union, share one namespace; they move to a
table of their own. A name resolves the way C does: the ordinary
identifier first, the tag when that leads nowhere.

While resolving a typedef, the target was taken apart with cadr
whatever it was, so (typedef points (¤ point 4)) reported point's
fields as its own -- an array of four points claiming to be a point,
and a macro reaching through it with v->x. Only a name and
(struct|union|enum NAME) name a type now.
2026-09-21 15:28:39 +03:00
08bbe17883 make feature guard produce nothing on eof/closing bracket/paren
A dropped datum is replaced by whatever follows it, but what follows
may be the end of the file or the paren closing the list we are
in. Hand the token back to the caller instead: read-list closes its
list with it and the toplevel loop stops.

A `;' comment between a guard and the form it guards was also taken for
the guarded datum, so the form stayed unconditional and the guard did
nothing. Skip comments when reading the guard.

comment-form? was defined three times over; it moves to utils.
2026-09-21 14:49:24 +03:00
19 changed files with 279 additions and 85 deletions

View File

@@ -90,7 +90,8 @@ sextest: $(EGGS_STAMP)
$(MAKE) -C ./tools/sextest sextest
cp ./tools/sextest/sextest .
SEX_TEST_PROGRAMS = hello-world lists comments unicode serialize features
SEX_TEST_PROGRAMS = hello-world lists comments unicode serialize features \
feature-flags
# Multi-module linking is checked end to end; see tests/modules/Makefile.
check-modules: sexc

View File

@@ -135,9 +135,6 @@ forms, and what remains."
(car type)
type))
(define (comment-form? f)
(and (pair? f) (eq? (car f) 'comment)))
;;; Strip ;s so ;;; Foo becomes /* Foo */ and not /* ;; Foo */
(define (strip-comment-marker text)
(string-trim-both (string-trim text #\;)))
@@ -279,7 +276,7 @@ forms, and what remains."
;; it's a strong semantic cue
`(%array ,(walk-type (maybe-unwrap-type array-type)))))
(('fn arglist ret-type)
`(%fun ,(walk-type ret-type) ,(walk-arglist arglist)))
`(%fun ,(walk-type ret-type) ,(walk-arg-types arglist)))
(('fn . _)
(sex-error form "malformed function type" form))
@@ -291,8 +288,13 @@ forms, and what remains."
(else
(type-convert-to-c form))))
;;; An array or a function type
(define (structured-type? form)
(and (pair? form) (memq (car form) '(¤ fn))))
(define (has-pointer-star? form)
(and (pair? form)
(not (structured-type? form))
(or (memq '* form)
(any has-pointer-star? (filter pair? form)))))
@@ -304,6 +306,10 @@ forms, and what remains."
(and (pair? type)
(any has-pointer-star? (filter pair? type))))
(define (nested-structured-type type)
(and (pair? type)
(find structured-type? (filter pair? type))))
(define (type-convert-to-c type)
;; Our pointers to C pointers
;; int -> int
@@ -311,6 +317,12 @@ forms, and what remains."
;; const * const char -> const char * const
(when (nested-pointer? type)
(sex-error type "pointer chains are written flat, as (* * T), not nested" type))
(let ((inner (nested-structured-type type)))
(when inner
(if (eq? (car inner) 'fn)
;; (fn ...) is spelled as the pointer it already is in C
(sex-error type "a fn type is a function pointer already: write (fn ...), not (* (fn ...))" type)
(sex-error type "a pointer to an array is not supported" type))))
(if (atom? type) (atom-to-fmt-c type)
(flatten
(tree-map atom-to-fmt-c
@@ -334,26 +346,39 @@ forms, and what remains."
((¤ * const volatile struct union) #t)
(else #f)))
;;; Does the parameter name itself?
;;; (f1 float) does
;;; (float), (const char) and (¤ float 4) do not
(define (named-arg? arg)
(and (pair? arg)
(pair? (cdr arg)) ; 1 element args are always type
(not (eq? (car arg) '¤))
(not (is-probably-type arg))))
;;; The type of one parameter
(define (arg-type arg)
(if (named-arg? arg)
(walk-type (maybe-unwrap-type (cdr arg)))
;; A lone type may arrive wrapped in parens of its own, and those
;; are not part of it: ((* const char))
;; Plain names e.g. (int) are left as is
(walk-type (if (and (pair? arg) (null? (cdr arg)) (pair? (car arg)))
(car arg)
arg))))
(define (walk-arglist form)
;; E.g.:
;; ((float) (int) (const char) (* const char) (¤ (* const struct res) 32))
;; ((f1 float) (f2 float) (f3 float) (res (¤ float 4)))
(map (fn
(match x
(('¤ . _) (walk-type x))
;; yeah shitty, but I don't know yet how to determine if the
;; first entry is part of the type and not an argument name
;; :(
((? is-probably-type) (walk-type x))
;; 1 element args are always type
((_) (walk-type x))
((var . type) (append (list (walk-type (maybe-unwrap-type type)))
(list (walk-type var))))))
(map (lambda (arg)
(if (named-arg? arg)
(list (arg-type arg) (walk-type (car arg)))
(arg-type arg)))
(remove comment-form? form)))
(define (walk-arg-types form)
(map arg-type (remove comment-form? form)))
(define (walk-function form)
;; (fn ret-type name arglist body) -> normal function
;; (fn ret-type name arglist) -> prototype

View File

@@ -115,6 +115,21 @@
((eq? tok dot-token) (error "Unexpected ."))
(else tok))))
;;; A token that stands for a datum
(define (datum-token? tok)
(not (or (eof-object? tok)
(eq? tok close-paren)
(eq? tok close-bracket)
(eq? tok dot-token))))
;;; next-token, sans the comments
(define (next-code-token port)
(let loop ()
(let ((tok (next-token port)))
(if (comment-form? tok)
(loop)
tok))))
;;; Read list elements up to close-paren or close-bracket,
;;; honoring dotted-pair notation (a b . c)
(define (read-list port closer)
@@ -208,13 +223,24 @@
(else (error "Malformed feature expression" test))))
;;; The #-/#+ preceded datum is always read -- there is no other way
;;; to know where it ends -- and then either returned or dropped
;;; to know where it ends -- and then either returned or dropped. What
;;; follows a dropped datum is read in its place: `#+x #+y (a) (b)'
;;; with only x is (b).
;;;
;;; That next thing may be nothing: the end of the file, or the
;;; paren closing the list we are in
(define (read-conditional port keep-when)
(let ((keep (eq? keep-when (feature-true? (read-datum port)))))
(if keep
(read-datum port)
(begin (read-datum port)
(next-token port)))))
(let* ((test (next-code-token port))
(keep (begin
(unless (datum-token? test)
(error "Unexpected end of input in feature expression"))
(eq? keep-when (feature-true? test))))
(guarded (next-code-token port)))
(cond
(keep guarded)
;; A datum was dropped, so the next one stands in for it
((datum-token? guarded) (next-token port))
(else guarded))))
;;; #t / #true / #f / #false. `val' is the boolean; consume any
;;; trailing name characters and validate

View File

@@ -141,25 +141,10 @@
;;; Fn processing
(define (comment-form? f)
(and (pair? f) (eq? (car f) 'comment)))
(define (strip-fn-header-comments fn-form)
;; Remove comment forms from the function header
;; ([pub|extern] fn name arglist rettype) so the positional accessors
;; below are not shifted. Comments in the body are left in place as
;; ordinary statements and preserved into the generated C.
(let ((header-count (if (memq (car fn-form) '(pub extern)) 5 4)))
;; This always rebuilds the list, so the location has to be carried
;; over explicitly -- otherwise every function loses it
(copy-form-source!
fn-form
(let loop ((form fn-form) (kept 0) (acc (list)))
(cond
((null? form) (reverse acc))
((= kept header-count) (append (reverse acc) form))
((comment-form? (car form)) (loop (cdr form) kept acc))
(else (loop (cdr form) (+ kept 1) (cons (car form) acc))))))))
;; ([pub|extern] fn name arglist rettype)
(strip-header-comments fn-form
(if (memq (car fn-form) '(pub extern)) 5 4)))
(define (process-fn sex-fn-raw acc)
(let* ((sex-fn (strip-fn-header-comments sex-fn-raw))

View File

@@ -737,10 +737,13 @@
(cat (c-type (cadr type) #f)
" (*" (or name "") ")("
(fmt-join (lambda (x) (c-type x #f)) (caddr type) ", ") ")"))
;; MODIFIED FROM UPSTREAM fmt-c: a nameless declarator -- an
;; array parameter of a function type, where C has no room
;; for a name -- arrives as #f, and upstream printed it
((%array)
(let ((name (cat name "[" (if (pair? (cddr type))
(c-expr (caddr type))
"")
(let ((name (cat (or name "") "[" (if (pair? (cddr type))
(c-expr (caddr type))
"")
"]")))
(c-type (cadr type) name)))
((%pointer *)
@@ -773,10 +776,13 @@
(cat (c-type (cadr type) #f)
" (*" (or name "") ")("
(fmt-join (lambda (x) (c-type x #f)) (caddr type) ", ") ")"))
;; MODIFIED FROM UPSTREAM fmt-c: a nameless declarator -- an
;; array parameter of a function type, where C has no room
;; for a name -- arrives as #f, and upstream printed it
((%array)
(let ((name (cat name "[" (if (pair? (cddr type))
(c-expr (caddr type))
"")
(let ((name (cat (or name "") "[" (if (pair? (cddr type))
(c-expr (caddr type))
"")
"]")))
(c-type (cadr type) name)))
((%pointer *)

View File

@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
(import scheme
(scheme base)
(only sex-macros cat comment)
(only types get-type-info get-fields get-underlying-type
type-match map-fields))
(only types get-type-info get-tag-info get-fields
get-underlying-type type-match map-fields))
,@body)))
(define (get-macro name)

View File

@@ -79,10 +79,16 @@
;; A function is reduced to a prototype and keeps its `pub', so
;; the importing unit declares it with external linkage
((fn)
(cons (copy-form-source! form (take form 5)) acc))
(cons (copy-form-source!
form
(take (strip-header-comments form 5) 5))
acc))
;; A variable becomes an `extern' declaration
((var)
(cons (copy-form-source! form (cons 'extern (take (cdr form) 3))) acc))
(cons (copy-form-source!
form
(cons 'extern (take (cdr (strip-header-comments form 4)) 3)))
acc))
((define defmacro enum import include struct typedef union)
(cons (copy-form-source! form (cdr form)) acc))
(else (sex-error form "pub must be followed by a definition" form))))

View File

@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@
# It also checks what only a second translation unit can check: that an
# imported type reaches the type database, by expanding a macro that
# reads the imported struct's fields.
#
# The public forms carry comments in their headers, which the reduction
# to a prototype and to an extern both have to look past.
SEXC ?= ../../sexc

View File

@@ -7,7 +7,11 @@
(include stdio.h)
(pub var greet-count int 0)
(pub var greet-count ;; a comment in the header of a public form is
;; not part of it: what the importer is given has
;; to be `extern int greet-count', not a form
;; counted off by one
int 0)
(pub struct greeting ((text (* const char)) (times int)))
@@ -23,7 +27,8 @@
(lambda (name field-type)
`(printf "%s " ,(symbol->string name))))))
(pub fn greet ((name (* const char))) void
(pub fn greet ;; ...and here the prototype would lose its return type
((name (* const char))) void
(++ greet-count)
(printf "hello, %s\n" name))

View File

@@ -80,6 +80,22 @@
;; guards nest
(feature-test '((a)) (x y) "#+x #+y (a)")
(feature-test '((b)) (x) "#+x #+y (a) (b)")
;; ...and the inner one may leave nothing behind: the end of the
;; file, or the paren closing the list, is what the outer one then
;; produces, and neither is an error
(feature-test '() (x) "#+x #+y (a)")
(feature-test '((f)) (x) "(f #+x #+y 1)")
(feature-test '((f 2)) (x) "(f #+x #+y 1 2)")
(feature-test '((a)) (x) "(a) #+x #+y (b)")
;; a comment between a guard and the form it guards describes the
;; guard. Taking it for the guarded datum would leave the form itself
;; unconditional
(feature-test '((a)) (x) "#+x ;; why\n (a)")
(feature-test '() (y) "#+x ;; why\n (a)")
(feature-test '((b)) (y) "#+x ;; why\n (a) (b)")
;; a comment after the guarded form is an ordinary form, and stays
(feature-test '((comment "; tail")) (y) "#+x (a) ;; tail")
;; a feature the program was not given is simply absent
(feature-test '() () "#+anything (a)")

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
(compilation "-f alpha --features beta --features=gamma --no-platform-features")
(input)
(output "alpha" "beta" "gamma" "elsewhere")
(return 0)
;;; The flags naming the features, in every spelling sexc takes. This
;;; is not pedantry about the command line: sextest reads the program
;;; itself and prints the surviving forms to sexc, so a spelling it
;;; does not recognise leaves the guards below resolved against the
;;; wrong set -- quietly, since the test then checks the output of a
;;; program it did not mean to compile.
;;;
;;; --no-platform-features is what makes `#-unix' true wherever this is
;;; compiled, and it has to be honoured on both sides for that to hold.
(include stdio.h)
(pub fn main () int
#+alpha (puts "alpha")
#+beta (puts "beta")
#+gamma (puts "gamma")
#-unix (puts "elsewhere")
#+unix (puts "here")
(return 0))

View File

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
map-fields
get-type-info
get-tag-info
get-fields
get-underlying-type)
"../types.scm")

View File

@@ -79,6 +79,38 @@
#f
(get-fields 't-u8))
;; C keeps typedefs and ordinary identifiers apart, and the canonical way
;; to declare a struct uses both names at once. Neither declaration
;; may stand on the other.
(add-struct 't-node '(struct t-node ((next (* t-node)) (v int))))
(add-typedef 't-node '(typedef t-node (struct t-node)))
(test "a typedef of a struct's own name keeps the struct reachable"
'((next (* t-node)) (v int))
(get-fields 't-node))
(test "and the tag is there under its own name"
'(struct t-node ((next (* t-node)) (v int)))
(get-tag-info 't-node))
(add-struct 't-rect '(struct t-rect ((w int) (h int))))
(add-define 't-rect '(define t-rect 3))
(test "a define of a tag's name does not hide the fields"
'((w int) (h int))
(get-fields 't-rect))
;; A type built over a struct is not that struct. Handing back the
;; element's fields would have a macro write v->x for an array
(add-typedef 't-points '(typedef t-points (¤ t-point 4)))
(test "an array of a struct has no fields of its own"
#f
(get-fields 't-points))
(add-typedef 't-point-p '(typedef t-point-p (* t-point)))
(test "nor does a pointer to one"
#f
(get-fields 't-point-p))
(add-typedef 't-cb '(typedef t-cb (fn ((t-point)) void)))
(test "nor a function type over one"
#f
(get-fields 't-cb))
;; A typedef can be written to lead back to itself. Resolving it must
;; stop rather than spin
(add-typedef 't-loop-a '(typedef t-loop-a t-loop-b))

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
(import scheme
(scheme base) ; let-values
brev-separate
(chicken base)
(chicken file)
@@ -33,27 +34,45 @@
(cons (list) (list))
contents))
;;; --features from the (compilation ...) form, which we have to honour
;;; ourselves: the program is read here and printed back out for sexc,
;;; so #+ and #- are resolved on this side
;;; The feature flags of the (compilation ...) form, which we have to
;;; honour ourselves: the program is read here and printed back out for
;;; sexc, so #+ and #- are resolved on this side.
;;;
;;; Returns the named features and whether the host's own are in play
(define (compilation-features settings)
(let ((compilation (assoc 'compilation settings)))
(if compilation
(append-map (lambda (flag)
(if (string-prefix? "--features=" flag)
(map string->symbol
(string-split (substring flag 11) ","))
(let loop ((flags (if compilation
(string-split (cadr compilation))
(list)))
(string-split (cadr compilation)))
(list))))
(features (list))
(platform #t))
(define (add names rest)
(loop rest
(append features (map string->symbol (string-split names ",")))
platform))
(cond
((null? flags) (values features platform))
;; past `--' the flags are the C compiler's
((string=? (car flags) "--") (values features platform))
((string=? (car flags) "--no-platform-features")
(loop (cdr flags) features #f))
((and (member (car flags) '("-f" "--features")) (pair? (cdr flags)))
(add (cadr flags) (cddr flags)))
((string-prefix? "--features=" (car flags))
(add (substring (car flags) 11) (cdr flags)))
((string-prefix? "-f" (car flags))
(add (substring (car flags) 2) (cdr flags)))
(else (loop (cdr flags) features platform))))))
(define (process-file target-path)
(let* ((first-pass (split-settings (read-raw-forms target-path)))
(features (compilation-features (car first-pass))))
(if (null? features)
first-pass
(parameterize ((current-features (append (platform-features) features)))
(split-settings (read-raw-forms target-path))))))
(let ((first-pass (split-settings (read-raw-forms target-path))))
(let-values (((features platform?) (compilation-features (car first-pass))))
(if (and (null? features) platform?)
first-pass
(parameterize ((current-features
(append (if platform? (platform-features) (list))
features)))
(split-settings (read-raw-forms target-path)))))))
(define (compile src compilation sexc)
(let ((compiler (or

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
(get-env-var
set-working-directory
to-absolute-pathname
comment-form?
strip-header-comments
list-split
list-join
recons

View File

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
map-fields
get-type-info
get-tag-info
get-fields
get-underlying-type)
"types.scm")

View File

@@ -15,7 +15,11 @@
srfi-1
srfi-69)
(define +type-db+ (make-hash-table))
;;; Two namespaces: `struct point' and a `point' typedef are separate
;;; declarations. Tags -- struct, union and enum alike -- share the
;;; second table between them
(define +type-db+ (make-hash-table)) ; typedefs and defines
(define +tag-db+ (make-hash-table)) ; struct, union and enums
(define (strip-pub form)
(if (eq? (car form) 'pub) (cdr form) form))
@@ -44,17 +48,17 @@
(list))))
(define (add-struct name form)
(hash-table-set! +type-db+ name
(hash-table-set! +tag-db+ name
(list 'struct name (normalize-fields (aggregate-fields form)))))
(define (add-union name form)
(hash-table-set! +type-db+ name
(hash-table-set! +tag-db+ name
(list 'union name (normalize-fields (aggregate-fields form)))))
;;; ([pub] enum name (value ...))
(define (add-enum name form)
(let ((f (strip-pub form)))
(hash-table-set! +type-db+ name
(hash-table-set! +tag-db+ name
(list 'enum name (if (and (pair? (cddr f)) (list? (caddr f)))
(caddr f)
(list))))))
@@ -70,8 +74,14 @@
(hash-table-set! +type-db+ name
(list 'define name (cddr (strip-pub form)))))
(define (get-tag-info name)
(hash-table-ref/default +tag-db+ name #f))
;;; First look up the ordinary identifier, then tag of that id when
;;; no ordinary one was declared, as C does
(define (get-type-info name)
(hash-table-ref/default +type-db+ name #f))
(or (hash-table-ref/default +type-db+ name #f)
(get-tag-info name)))
;;; ((name type) ...) for a struct or union, #f for anything else --
;;; including a name that was never declared. Callers give the better
@@ -100,19 +110,31 @@
;;; The declaration NAME ultimately names. For a typedef that is the
;;; entry of whatever it stands for, and for anything else it is
;;; NAME's own info.
;;; NAME's own info
(define (target-tag target)
(cond
((symbol? target) target)
((and (pair? target)
(memq (car target) '(struct union enum))
(pair? (cdr target))
(symbol? (cadr target)))
(cadr target))
(else #f)))
(define (resolve-type-info name)
(let ((info (resolve-ordinary-type-info name)))
(if (and info (memq (car info) '(struct union enum)))
info
(or (get-tag-info name) info))))
(define (resolve-ordinary-type-info name)
(let ((info (get-type-info name)))
(and info
(if (eq? (car info) 'typedef)
(let* ((target (get-underlying-type name))
(tag (cond ((symbol? target) target)
((and (pair? target)
(pair? (cdr target))
(symbol? (cadr target)))
(cadr target))
(else #f))))
(and tag (get-type-info tag)))
(let ((tag (target-tag (get-underlying-type name))))
;; A typedef target is written in type position, where
;; `struct point' means the tag
(and tag (or (get-tag-info tag) (get-type-info tag))))
info))))
;;; Type matcher macro

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
(get-env-var
set-working-directory
to-absolute-pathname
comment-form?
strip-header-comments
list-split
list-join
recons

View File

@@ -42,6 +42,24 @@
(current-directory)
pathname)))
(define (comment-form? form)
(and (pair? form) (eq? (car form) 'comment)))
;;; Remove the comment forms from the first COUNT elements of FORM --
;;; its header -- so that the positional accessors reading it are not
;;; shifted by one
(define (strip-header-comments form count)
;; This always rebuilds the list, so the location has to be carried
;; over explicitly -- otherwise every form loses it
(copy-form-source!
form
(let loop ((rest form) (kept 0) (acc (list)))
(cond
((null? rest) (reverse acc))
((= kept count) (append (reverse acc) rest))
((comment-form? (car rest)) (loop (cdr rest) kept acc))
(else (loop (cdr rest) (+ kept 1) (cons (car rest) acc)))))))
(define (list-split src-list split-elt)
;; split '(1 2 / 3 4 / 5 6) by '/ -> '((1 2) (3 4) (5 6))
(fold (lambda (elt acc)