Files
sex/sex-macros.scm
alex-eg 1f445f0f9b implement type inference
Two things out of one mechanism. `_' as a type means "work it out from
the initializer", so (var n _ (strlen s)) stops needing size-t spelled
out; `type-of' hands a macro the type of an expression, so a macro can
dispatch on what it was handed rather than on what was declared. Both
read the same answers from two sides.

Algorithm W's core, intra-procedural, with the extensions C forces:

  - an unknown type, since (include stdio.h) brings in names we never
    parsed. Unification is consistency rather than equality, so
    anything touching an unparsed declaration stops constraining
    instead of rejecting a program that compiled yesterday;
  - the usual arithmetic conversions, since `+' is not a function of
    one type;
  - checking mode for initializers, since #(0 0) has no type of its own
    and takes one from its context. #(T : ...) is the way out of that.

What it wanted on the way:

  - what type a *name* has, which neither the typedef nor the tag
    database recorded. One table serves functions and variables, since
    a function type already has a surface spelling;
  - a scope chain, so a (var c int 9) inside a do ends with the block;
  - form-type, keyed by cons cell, so one form has one type;
  - macros expanded during the walk rather than before it, so type-of
    is answered in the scope the macro was written in.

Closures take the same machinery: a receiver whose type comes from a
call, captures written (name expr) and typed from the expression, and
conversion from a bare function wherever a closure is expected.

type-match grew `_' on the pattern side, since (closure ((int)) int)
and (closure ((float)) int) were separate clauses for one case.
2026-09-30 00:09:32 +03:00

56 lines
1.7 KiB
Scheme

(import
scheme
(only fmt fmt)
(chicken base)
(chicken plist)
(chicken string))
(define (cat-syms s-1 s-2)
(fmt #f s-1 s-2))
(define (cat sym-1 sym-2)
(string->symbol (cat-syms sym-1 sym-2)))
;;; The reader keeps `;' comments as (comment "...") forms so they can
;;; be re-emitted into the generated C. In a macro body a comment
;;; should be a call which does nothing, hence this one
(define (comment . _)
(void))
(define (register-macro name arglist body)
(put! name 'sex-macro
`(lambda ,arglist
;; A macro body is ordinary Scheme, evaluated at compile
;; time. It gets `cat' for building names, and read access to
;; the type database
(import scheme
(scheme base)
;; a type is a list, so a macro reading one wants
;; `(third type)' rather than `(caddr type)'
(only srfi-1 first second third fourth fifth last)
(only sex-macros cat comment)
(only types get-type-info get-tag-info get-fields
get-underlying-type type-match type-pattern-matches?
map-fields
get-name-type get-return-type type-of))
,@body)))
(define (get-macro name)
(eval (get name 'sex-macro)))
(define (macro? form)
(and (list? form)
(symbol? (car form))
(get (car form) 'sex-macro)))
(define (apply-macro form)
(assert (macro? form)
(fmt #f (car form) " is not a macro"))
(apply (get-macro (car form))
(cdr form)))
(define (defmacro form)
(let ((arglist (car form))
(body (cdr form)))
(register-macro (car arglist) (cdr arglist) body)))