support || | |= operators, since we now have our own parser
Some checks failed
Sex CI / build-linux (pull_request) Failing after 3m1s
Sex CI / build-linux (push) Failing after 3m1s
Sex CI / build-macos (push) Has been cancelled
Sex CI / build-macos (pull_request) Has been cancelled

This commit was merged in pull request #26.
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-15 20:17:05 +03:00
parent 7e6e32488b
commit 5f9f90ef37
2 changed files with 37 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@@ -114,6 +114,12 @@ forms, and what remains."
((attribute) '%attribute)
((¤) 'vector-ref)
((include) '%include)
;; a `|' inside a symbol has to be escaped to be written in
;; a Scheme source, so we just rename it in fmt-c compatible
;; way
((|\||) 'bit-or)
((|\|\||) '%or)
((|\|=|) 'bit-or=)
;; uh things we do for c89 compatibility
((bool) 'int)
((true) 1)
@@ -190,8 +196,6 @@ forms, and what remains."
(let-values (((comments slots _) (take-slots rest 2)))
(list '%cast (walk-type (cadr slots)) (walk-expr (car slots)))))
(('enum . _) (walk-enum form))
;; | is problematic... And c-or/bit-or/etc are actually
;; procedures, so we have to call the procedure itself
(('c-or . rest) (apply c-or (map walk-expr rest)))
(('c-bit-or . rest) (apply c-bit-or (map walk-expr rest)))
(('c-bit-or= . rest) (apply c-bit-or= (map walk-expr rest)))